In a strongly worded order, the Rajasthan High Court recently dismissed a writ petition filed by a man accusing his wife of plagiarizing her research thesis, calling it a clear attempt to misuse judicial process for settling personal grievances.
The petition was heard by Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand, who observed that courts are not platforms for litigants to pursue personal vendettas. The judge termed the writ petition an “abuse of the process of law” and emphasized that such cases erode the integrity of the justice system.
The matter dates back to 2023, when the petitioner lodged a formal complaint with the University of Rajasthan, seeking an inquiry into alleged plagiarism in his wife’s academic research. In response, the university formed a committee to examine the allegations. However, dissatisfied with the pace of proceedings or perceived inaction, the petitioner approached the High Court for further intervention.
The Court, however, made it clear that the petitioner had fulfilled his duty by submitting the complaint and that the university’s committee was the appropriate body to handle the issue. The Court found no justification for judicial interference at this stage.
“The law cannot be used as a tool for personal vendetta,” Justice Dhand remarked. “The petitioner’s ulterior motive is evident, and his approach to this Court is nothing but an attempt to weaponize the legal process to target his wife.” The judge further noted that the legal system should not be burdened with frivolous litigation rooted in domestic or personal disputes, especially when alternative remedies and institutional mechanisms are in place.
Calling the petition “misconceived” and “baseless,” the Court stated, “If the petitioner, being the husband of respondent No. 5, harbours any ill-will, he cannot use this Court to further his personal animosity. Doing so undermines not only the rights of the opposing party but also the time and attention due to genuine litigants.”
This decision underscores the importance of judicial integrity and reinforces that courts must remain focused on public interest and legitimate legal grievances—not be used as forums for personal score-settling.
The petitioner was represented by Advocate Shobit Tiwari.
