The Punjab and Haryana High Court on Friday voiced strong disapproval of the High Court Bar Association’s decision to observe a “no work day” in response to escalating tensions between India and Pakistan. Chief Justice Sheel Nagu remarked that it was inappropriate for legal professionals to withdraw from court duties while armed forces are actively engaged in national defense.
The Bar Association had issued a notice late Thursday night announcing its intention to suspend judicial work the following day, citing the growing hostilities at the border. The Association also requested the Court to refrain from passing any adverse orders in light of the lawyers’ absence. As a result, a majority of cases listed before the High Court had to be adjourned due to non-appearance by counsels.
During the hearing of a significant case related to the ongoing Punjab-Haryana water-sharing dispute, Chief Justice Nagu criticized the move. “The ‘No Work Call’ was unfortunate. I told your President, when the soldiers are out there fighting for the nation, you’re staying home and resting? That is very unfortunate,” he remarked from the bench.
The comments were made after the counsel for the Punjab government sought adjournment due to the absence of the senior advocate handling the matter. In response, Justice Nagu emphasized that the judicial system must continue to function, regardless of external tensions. “If we all stop working, the entire system will collapse,” he cautioned.
The Court was further informed that sirens had gone off in Panchkula earlier that morning and movement in the area had been restricted, further justifying the no work call. However, the Court suggested that lawyers could participate virtually in proceedings given the availability of online platforms. “Everyone can stay at home and still remain connected,” Justice Nagu noted.
Given the importance of the dispute at hand, the Bench, comprising Justice Nagu and Justice Sumeet Goel, decided to reconvene the matter at 4 PM the same day.
The Court’s remarks highlight the tension between national security concerns and the responsibility of legal professionals to uphold the continuity of justice, even during times of crisis.
